George Phillies for President 2008

7/19/2007

GEORGE PHILLIES: GOP AND DEMOCRATS FAIL TO ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS, BETRAY AMERICA

Something is wrong with immigration law in America, and presidential candidate George Phillies has a pretty good idea what it is.

Lack of enforcement.

In a statement released Monday night on his campaign website, http://phillies2008.org, the Libertarian Presidential hopeful from Massachusetts went further, saying, " The Democratic and Republican parties have betrayed the American people."

Phillies urged his fellow Americans to welcome legal immigrants warmly: ""Immigrants make enormous positive contributions to our America. They're one reason we are the richest industrial country in the world."

"Immigration," he said, " is undoubtedly a cornerstone of American culture and American success. Legal immigration, that is, under immigration laws that are fairly and consistently administered. That's where our laws have broken down. Our immigration laws are not being applied fairly or consistently."

George Phillies believes Americans have every right to expect their government to enforce existing law. Border security is a growing concern among voters, particularly in the border states, with an estimated 11.1 million illegal immigrants residing in the United States as of 2005, a population that is estimated to grow by about half a million per year or 1,300 per day, according to the Pew Hispanic Center.

"Border enforcement is the non-negotiable demand of the great majority of the American people. Open borders? Sealed borders? So long as the Democratic-Republican establishment continues to refuse to enforce the laws they swore to uphold, it doesn't matter what the laws say."

*Sources: CNN.COM and the Pew Hispanic Center, http://www.cnn.com/interactive/us/0603/charts.immigration/frameset.exclude.html?eref=yahoo

http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/61.pdf

Contact Information:

Carolyn Marbry pressdirector@phillies2008.org
(510) 276-3216

George Phillies for President 2008 http://phillies2008.org

Found a 2008 persidential candidate to support

A good friend of mine was recently appointed as press director for the George Phillies 2008 presidential campaign. I had already heard of George Phillies and had already given much thought to his potential as a presidential candidate. After my friend was given the duties of press director, I thought I would help things along. After all, what are friends for?

There seems to be more and more people in the U.S. that want something better. Instead of voting for someone they have moved toward a mind set of voting against someone. That doesn't seem to make much sense. It's like our choices have become "should I vote for dumb or dumber" and that really shouldn't be the way things are.

George Phillies seems, to me, to be a man that is capable of making proper decisions. Even though he has ideas on how things are and how to address many issues, he is also open to new ideas that might better be used to make a positive difference. That is rare in a nation of politicians that are more about telling us what we need rather than listening to what we say. Freshing, if you ask me.

Along with my own posts I will be posting press releases as I see them for the George Phillies
2008 run. I hope this provides people with the feeling of having a viable alternative to the two big parties that have slowly eroded the politics of our country, The United States of America.

Look back for time to time to get the skinny on what is happening in the campaign.

Don't give up on me

After the loss of my father, things have been a little crazy. I have a great number of things to get cleaned up and will be getting somethings done where I can better help my mother with a lot of things.

I will be posting, though. I just need to get some things together on the personal side of life before jumping back into this. Things will just be a little disorganized for a while.

Please check back very so often for updates, I promise to turn out some good posts once things begin to clear up.

Father

What is a father? A father is a figure in one's life that provides security in the face of fear. He is the go to guy when things go wrong. A father is more than a bio donor for life. He is the power that builds character and self worth. He is the one that we look to for guidance.

I am not much for heart felt words. There is no way I can truly describe what is is to be a father. I am one, myself, and I have no idea how I am defined.

To me, a father is the first man in a person's life that provides comfort in times of trouble. He is the enforcer when we do wrong. I believe Holly Dunn said it best "Daddy's hands weren't always gentle but I've come to understand...There was always love in Daddy's hands".

I lost my father, today. The man I always saw as invincible, laying on a hospital bed, motionless. I had to be the strong one. I had to be there for my mother and sister. As hard as it was, I fought back tears until my mother told me it was ok to cry. She knew I was trying to be strong. She knew I was trying to be the pillar for the family. I'm not a weak man but she knew I couldn't hold back forever, mothers know these things.

I'm going to Tennessee tomorrow to be with my family. My father was raised there and he will be buried next to his mother and father. He was a very politically motivated man. I will continue my time in hunting down the wrongs in our system. He knew I was big into politics. We didn't always share the same ideas but he repected me for my thoughts, and me him.

Finances will be tight and I will be moving in with my mother at the end of the month to help her cover bills until the house is paid off. That is what family is for. I just had to get this off my chest and the only outlet I have is writing.

I am still working on my series dealing with the Bill of Rights. I will pick back up once everything is settled down. I don't know how many readers I have, if any, but I felt it was needed for me to explain why things have been slow in coming in my posts.

I hope to get into full swing after the end of the month. Maybe sooner.

Thank you all for reading and if you feel inclined to help with finances, please do so. I have a donation button to the right. I'm not requesting but it would certainly help and be very much appreciated.

Father's Day is coming up. Remember to tell your fathers how much you love them. You never know when they will be gone and you lose that chance.

If anyone wants to views the works of this man in his political views, his Web site is http://www.rlt54.com

Thank you, and God bless.

Our rights as Americans: The begining

It seems to me that our constitutional rights are being taken away at an alarming rate. Oh yeah, I know the first thing that just popped into your head "Bush did it!". Well, to some extent, yeah, you're right. To be honest, though, he didn't do it alone and this frightening trend started way before the Bush Jr. administration.

This post is a precursor to a string of posts. I want to go through the bill of rights and expose the truth of what has been going on in our country for everyone to see. I will do this from the most logical place. The first amendment. I will go from there to the last showing that the United States is being taken over by two groups of intelligent non-altruistic groups of self gratifying ingrates. I might even toss in a few points from our judicial system just to make sure it is known that our gradual demise is not just rooted in the legislative and executive branches of our system.

Checks and balances are tipping against us. We must open our eyes to what is happening before it is too late. Our government is betraying us and the foundation our country was built on. Please be patient with my posts on this. I want to make sure I am clear on what I present and that I have enough backing evidence/proof to give with every thing that will be presented.

I want my children's future as Americans to be a bright one. Let's make a difference for our future.

Immigrants, friend or foe? I'd say friend.

This entry is to cover some issues that I have run across while listening to a morning radio show on a local rock station here in Houston (Walton and Johnson morning show on Houston Rock Station 103.7 FM http://www.houstonrock1037.com/). I will also cover some ideas that I have been involved in discussing on a few online political forums.

I had originally intended to make this one huge blog covering as many as 8 issues that we face here in the U.S.. This has proven to be a bit of a task and I have decided to break each issue into its own post to save everyone, including myself, the headache of going through them all at one time.

I know I have been out of the scene for a while but I had some personal, family issues that needed to be worked on. I hope to get some positive feedback (Well, any feedback would be good) from these posts because I am doing a great deal of work to make this happen. I wouldn’t mind being noticed even if I am not appreciated.

Due to the amount of time needed to each point of this issue, I will only touch on highlighted points and go into further detail or discussion for individual points if comments merit.

Immigration

This is a touchy subject for a lot of people. Before continuing with a suggested solution, I will first take a look at the problem. Seems like a logical place to start. Keep in mind that there are exceptions to almost everything.

First off, let’s try and look at this for what it is. Immigration is good. There is nothing wrong with immigration as long as it takes the proper channels. There is a difference between entering another country through legal channels and entering another country through means of legal evasion. The lines between the two are obvious.

When a person enters another nation by contacting the immigration authorities and filing for work or education visas or with a request for citizenship, that person is entering through legal channels. When a person enters another nation under the cloak of night or in the trunk of a car to avoid being detected, they are illegally entering that nation and should be subject to legal recourse from authoritative entities.

As for having civil rights, you are not afforded certain rights under the Constitution of the United States if you are not a legal citizen. The "courts" can interpret what ever they want but if it were the intended purpose of the amendment or law, it would have been practiced that way from it's inception. The Constitution was written to protect U.S. citizens, not illegal immigrants. If you have not taken steps to become a legal citizen, you have no legal recourse against detention and/or deportation.

Let’s take a look at some things that feed this problem. The starting point is Mexico. Clash of financial classes along with a horrible taxation system put the common man there in a bad situation in terms of living a comfortable life and providing for his or her family. Education and healthcare in Mexico has little to be desired for lower income families. This creates another avenue for desired migration to “a better land”. Polls in Mexico have shown, recently, that almost half the Mexican population wants to move to the U.S. (http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/001168.html). This fact, in and of itself, really isn’t a problem. The problem is the method in which many of these people attempt to accomplish this goal.

Blame for wanting to come to the U.S. to provide a better life for themselves and their children should not be placed on the people that want to migrate. The reasons should be placed upon the Mexican government for being historically oppressive by nature and the U.S. government for not allowing proper channels to be available for those that want a better life here. In fact the U.S. is, through policy and lack of legal enforcement, encouraging illegal immigration.

The U.S. has spread resources into areas where it should not be. I know in this day and age everyone wants to place the blame for that on the Bush administration but that simply isn’t the case for a large portion of U.S. resources. Granted, the Bush administration hasn’t done much to resolve this problem but then, neither has any other administration over the last 60 years.

The U.S. has little, if any, control over what the Mexican government does. Therefore, if we want to resolve this issue we must have certain things in place to make sure that legal movement is more manageable. This can be done while, at the same time, helping to secure our boarders.

Two points of interest come to mind; military deployment and the war on drugs. The U.S. has a bad habit of staying in countries where we have fought wars in defense of our interests and allies. Why are we still in Europe? I understand having naval ports available in various parts of the world to be set in case there is a need to reply to an attack on U.S. soil and we need to have restocking points to get where we need to go. Most of America's combat first response is in the form of aerial and naval which is more than capable of holding their own until ground troops are in place. Even the ground support units that may be needed (Spec. Ops. forward air controllers, target acquisition scouts, etc…) can be flown in where they are needed. Why do we need Army, Marine and Air Force bases running in Europe?

Why not take those military personnel and place them on our boarders where they can defend our homeland? I’m not saying they should be set in place to shoot immigrants. I want to cut that off right here before getting accused of being a militant racist. The point of the U.S. military is to defend the U.S.. Our boarders are where they belong, not in Europe where there is minimal threat to the U.S.. Having military bases close to our borders will be a deterrent for those looking to cross in those areas. I would, personally, think twice before walking past a base filled with armed guards and tanks. Plus, the addition of these bases can help bolster the local economies in near by towns/cities.

Now we come to something that will probably get me flamed by some and praised by others, the war on drugs. At 12 billion dollars a year, how many entry stations could we put in place and/or maintained? There is almost 2000 miles of land border between the U.S. and Mexico. In that 2000 mile stretch there are just over 20 commercial crossing points that handle, roughly, 350,000,000 legal crossings per year into the U.S.. That's a lot of checks at the border for so few, legal, entry points.

The war on drugs would be much better covered at the border than several hundred or several thousand miles away and will help build a better image, internationally, for the U.S. by showing that we are becoming less intent on being intrusive and interventional. Multi-function centers placed on our borders will all for legal immigration as well as screening points for those crossing into the U.S.. This will reduce the burden of endless miles of travel for border patrol agents allowing them to be more effective in covering illegal crossing. It will also give, what is currently DEA, employees a chance to be home with their families rather than going into foreign nations and risking life and limb.

Politicians need to make some decisions before everything falls apart. I hear people complaining everyday so if you have a problem with any of my suggested solutions, please provide alternatives and do not just complain to me for saying something you don't like. We have enough complaints, we need solutions.

Additional References:

<>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S.-Mexico_border

http://www.cfr.org/publication/10373/

http://www.dea.gov/agency/staffing.htm

http://www.ncjrs.gov/ondcppubs/publications/enforce/border/ins_3.html

Jobs: Insourcing and Outsourcing - America

There has been in recent years an influx of negative publicity for American companies outsourcing some of their job functions to foreign countries. The opponents of this form of outsourcing have been very vocal but little attention has been given to the possible long term benefits of such actions. On the same note, little attention has been given to the number of in sourced companies that provide jobs and revenue to the local economies and how those in sourced jobs are affected by outsourced jobs to foreign countries. In sourced jobs, encouraged by outsourced jobs, will provide local companies more revenue by purchasing materials and equipment for less, locally.

Outsourcing opponents tend to put the short term problems in the forefront of the overseas outsourcing debate. It is expected that there will be stumbling blocks along the way to any form of positive progress. Mark Levinson (April 2004) has said, “Why haven't developing countries benefited from increased openness to trade… Because many countries are now similarly positioned in the international economy--producing apparel, toys, and electronics for export--they must compete feverishly for investment by multinational producers” (One-sided World. The American Prospect, p61, ¶ 6). What he fails to mention is that the number of countries that are capable of supporting “investment by multinational producers”, are relatively small in numbers. Outsourcing tends to favor nations that produce acceptable levels of education and services. This reduces over expansion and provides specific nations with little need to compete for certain types of multi national investments. In his defense, not all developing nations will benefit, especially if they cannot provide investors with adequate resources at reasonable cost.

Many opponents of outsourcing also tend to complain quite a bit about the United States not taking a more active role in assisting less fortunate nations around the world. By allowing companies to outsource production and services they are assisting many less fortunate nations to become more financially stable and less dependent on foreign aid. New jobs being created by outsourcing provides higher paying jobs to those who would otherwise make much less or have no income at all. With more and higher paying jobs in these nations, the governments are provided more avenues for tax collection and at higher rates. This will assist in development and maintenance of basic infrastructure providing better roads, schools, utilities and sanitary functions. This can provide assistance with out resorting to international welfare and incurring international debt that would have to be paid back with in a certain time frame. In many cases, this debt will not be paid because the money collected at the government level seldom, if ever, makes it to the private sector where companies can build more stable income and long term economic growth can occur.

Outsourcing can provide positive return effects in the short and long term. The United States brings in more jobs from foreign companies than it loses to them. In fact, Bruce Bartlett (July 27, 2004) shows us, using information from the Organization for International Investment, that “For the past 15 years, corporations have moved jobs to the United States at a faster rate than jobs have left, for an 82 percent increase in insourced jobs compared to a 23 percent increase in outsourced jobs.” How Outsourcing Creates Jobs for Americans. National Center for Policy Analysis No. 480. In the same source it is noted that, in the same time span, there was a 117 percent increase in manufacturing jobs from in sourced companies compared to a 56 percent loss to outsourced companies. These findings counteract the popular belief that The United States is losing more by outsourcing to companies outside its boarders.

Many might say that foreign companies would pay less than indigenous companies would for workers inside The United States. This assumption has been shown to be incorrect. “Insourced jobs pay 16.5 percent more than the average domestic job, and one-third of them are in the manufacturing sector. These include plants that assemble German and Japanese automobiles and produce pharmaceuticals.” Bruce Bartlett (July 27, 2004) How Outsourcing Creates Jobs for Americans. National Center for Policy Analysis No. 480. Therefore, Workers inside The United States can benefit from in sourced jobs from foreign companies that open shop in The United States.

By utilizing lower cost labor and facilities in other countries soil, companies from The United States can direct more money locally for the research and development of products and services. These companies will still need to conduct consumer research in local areas to maintain a good understanding of what consumers of their products and services want and what demographics they will need to target their promotions. In researching, these companies will need to have development facilities and material close by their target customers so they might rapidly and more cost effectively distribute new ideas to test subjects in target areas.

Other indigenous companies will benefit from cost savings from lower labor spending on foreign soil. Marketing companies will have greater demand put on them to produce more innovations in advertisement methods because more money will be available for larger ad campaigns. Television, news papers and radio stations will benefit financially from increased advertisement revenues and consumers will have more information on what goods and services are available.

There is no doubt that—even though many will benefit—there will be others that do not fair so well at first. There would need to be plans in place to help those workers that are displaced when their jobs are moved to other locations. There have been suggestions of how this can be done in a way that will make transitions a little easier for displaced employees. Here are some ideas that an analyst has come up with that seem to be feasible to accomplish this.

In healthy economies, companies create new jobs — often with higher wages and higher value added to the economy — for most of the people who lose their old ones. Companies can make it easer for their workers to adjust by committing themselves to continual on-the-job learning and retraining programs. Policy makers can assist them by offering tax credits or other incentives for companies that hire and train displaced workers. Generous severance and relocation packages can help as well. (Diana Farrell, 2004, McKinsey Quarterly, Issue 3, p4-5, ¶4)

With some of the short-term issues involved in outsourcing as a result of global economic integration, people have to look at some of the long-term positive results to see the full benefits. Once foreign companies begin to show more sophistication and development, people are sure to see additional jobs open up in America from in sourcing. Foreign companies will eventually need to open facilities in the United States to reduce shipping costs for imported products. This will certainly provide jobs that were not there before. In addition, these companies will benefit from better educated American workers in terms of being more efficient.

Foreign companies in the United States will help produce more income for local companies. These foreign companies will take advantage of resources available to them in their immediate areas. This will increase sales of goods and services for American companies surrounding them. Even if these foreign companies send some of their higher position people to run the facilities in the United States, these people will contribute to the local economies by purchasing living goods and automobiles from local companies. More over, the local ad agencies and local media outlets will benefit from these companies through promotional needs.

After reviewing the long term benefits of outsourcing to foreign nations, we can see that stifling economic globalization might result in poor growth in the future of America and other countries. There are times during progress when you have to take a step back before you can take two steps forward. The world is in a unique position at this point in its history where people can truly make a solid, positive impact for the future of the human race. This can only be achieved if people and governments all work together toward a common goal; progress through unification.